Technical Assistance


Tax Increments & Development Finance


Tax Increment Financing (TIF) is referred to in a variety of ways throughout the country, These terms include tax allocation district (TAD-Geroiga), tax increment reinvestment zone (TIRZ-Texas), community reinvestment area (CRA-Florida) and economic redevelopment and growth grant (ERGG-New Jersey). Generally, however, TIFs adhere to a similar structure and function in a similar fashion, regardless of geography. Today, 48 states and the District of Columbia employ TIF tools, with rules and regulations varying by state.

A TIF district is a mechanism for capturing the future tax benefits of real estate improvements, in order to pay for the present cost of those improvements. It can be used to channel funding toward improvements in distressed or underdeveloped areas where development would not other occur.

Tax increment finance is a popular development finance tool generally used to address blight, promote neighborhood stability and inspire district oriented development. While each state's TIF statue is different, common policy goals and objectives exist. These intentions include blight elimination, something discussed in nearly every state's statue, and infrastructure additions and improvements.

A TIF district is often used to advance economic development priorities, including:
A TIF district is a powerful tool that can be address many needs in a community, It is often used to encourage development, eliminate blight, address environmental issues, and facilitate adaptive reuse. TIF uses the increased property and/or sales taxes generated by a new development to finance costs related to that particular development These costs may include public infrastructure, land acquisition, relocation, demolition, utilities, debt service and planning costs. A TIF district may also be used for a variety of other improvements, including:

Due Diligence and Transparency

The due diligence process is one of the most important elements in the use of TIF and should be considered throughout the decision making and financing process. Some local governments fail to conduct a thorough financial and legal analysis and find difficulties tin project completion as a result of these actions. However, with a solid process for vetting and evaluating TIF projects, the local government can minimize conflict and increase community participation in project fulfilment., Local governments should implement a transparent and thorough due diligence process. This includes closing examining the financial risk the local government will bear as well as the legal requirements of the state enabling legislation. Depending on the state statute and the structure of specific TIF financing's, there are a variety of risk that a local government might face, including: Engaging quality bond counsel and financial experts throughout the process can mitigate these risks. In addition, fully understanding the TIF laws before applying the tool will help keep legal issues from developing rather into the process. While TIF can finance a variety of improvements, it does have limitations that should be understood.

The "But For" Analysis
Some states require that a "But For" test be met before a TIF deal can be approved. Such a testt shows that "But For" the proposed level of TIF assistance and given timetable for the infrastructure, growth timetable for the infrastructure, growth, development at the proposed level would not occur. This type of analysis is strongly recommended best practice for TIF programs in all states for the following reasons: Community Education and Engagement Process
In most states, the TIF process requires local governments to hold open and public discussions. In order for a local government to use TIF to its fullest potential, it is essential to educated the community. TIF is a powerful tool and the process must be conducted in an open and thoughtful fashion. There are a number of areas that the local governments should consider as part of the education and engagement process, including:


The responsibility of implementation of TIF ultimately rests with the powers of local government. This power yields an accountability factor that cannot be ignored or set aside for the sake of priorities, headlines, or an eagerness to complete the projects. Local governments that have followed the recommended practices for due diligence and transparency will find it easier to comply with accountability requirements.


In each of these categories of qualified PAB's, bonds must meet the specific requirements of the IRC. These tests can be complex, and they require a clear understanding before bonds may be issued in order to ensure tax-exempt status. In relation to economic development efforts, the bonds outlined above represent the most concrete, readily available source of public finance. PAB use have increased exponentially over the past two decades, and today, they serve as the primary source for financing many types of projects, including infrastructure, industrial development and urban development.

Want to learn more on tax increment financing? View the Tax Increment Finance Resource Center

Helpful Links

Tax Increment Finance Resource Center
Understanding Tax Increment Finance
Case Studies on Tax Increment Finance
View All Tax Increment Finance Resouces

CDFA National Sponsors

  • Alliant Insurance Services, Inc.
  • BNY Mellon
  • Bricker Graydon LLP
  • Business Oregon
  • CohnReznick
  • Frost Brown Todd LLP
  • Grow America | Formerly NDC
  • Hawes Hill and Associates LLP
  • Hawkins Delafield & Wood LLP
  • Ice Miller LLP
  • KeyBanc Capital Markets
  • Kutak Rock LLP
  • McGuireWoods
  • MuniCap, Inc.
  • NW Financial Group, LLC
  • PGAV Planners, LLC
  • Raza Development Fund
  • SB Friedman Development Advisors
  • Stifel Nicolaus
  • The Bond Buyer
  • U.S. Bank
  • Wells Fargo Securities
Become a Sponsor